How to cite ai-generated images apa 7: A Practical Guide
When you cite an AI-generated image in APA 7, you're essentially crediting the AI company as the author. You'll use the year you created it as the date and give it a clear description in brackets. The source is simply the name of the AI tool you used. This approach keeps things transparent and upholds academic integrity, which is more important than ever with today's technology.
The New Challenge of Citing AI Images
Generative AI has completely changed the game for creating visuals. What used to take hours of design work or a paid stock photo subscription can now be done in seconds with a simple text command. It's an incredible leap forward, but it also brings a new headache: how do we properly attribute these machine-made images?
The scale of this is hard to wrap your head around. By August 2023, an estimated 15.5 billion AI-generated images already existed. On top of that, another 34 million were being pumped out daily. To put that in perspective, by early 2024, the platform Stable Diffusion was responsible for over 12.5 billion of those images all on its own. This explosion of content makes it crystal clear that we need consistent citation standards, and we need them now.
Why Standard Citation Rules Are So Important
Citing an AI image isn't just a formality. It’s about being transparent and honest in your work. A proper citation provides a clear trail back to how the visual was created, which is crucial for a few reasons:
- It shows your work. A good citation lets others understand how you got the image, including the tool and the exact prompt you used.
- It builds trust. Citing correctly shows you're serious about ethical sourcing and helps your audience distinguish between human and machine-generated content.
- It avoids plagiarism. You're giving credit where it's due—to the tool that did the heavy lifting.
- It adds context. The prompt itself can reveal a lot about your research or creative process.
The American Psychological Association (APA) has stepped in with guidelines that get straight to the point. They say to credit whoever is "responsible for the work." For AI images, that means the developer of the model, like OpenAI or Midjourney.
To get a complete picture of APA 7 citation for AI-generated images, it helps to break down the core components. Each piece has a specific role in creating a clear, transparent, and reproducible reference.
Core Components of an APA 7 AI Image Citation
| Component | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Author | Attributes the work to the developer of the AI model. | OpenAI |
| Date | Specifies when the image was generated. | (2024) |
| Title | Provides a concise, descriptive title of the image. | [A photorealistic image of a ginger tabby cat...] |
| Format | Identifies the type of AI tool used. | [Image by AI] or [Image generated by AI] |
| Source | Names the specific AI tool used to create the image. | DALL-E 3 |
| Prompt | Discloses the exact text prompt used to generate the image. | In the figure note or an appendix. |
These elements work together to form a complete citation that respects academic standards while adapting to new technology.
Understanding the Role of the Prompt
The text prompt is the DNA of any AI-generated image. It’s the direct instruction you give the machine to get your final result, which is why documenting it is non-negotiable for a good citation. Think of your prompt as the "methodology" section for your image; without it, the context is completely lost.
For example, "a photo of a cat" and "a photorealistic image of a ginger tabby cat sitting on a windowsill in the style of Vermeer" will produce wildly different results. Including the full, detailed prompt in a figure note gives your reader the clarity they need to understand your creative choices. Learning how to prompt AI to create an image effectively is a skill in itself.
To really see why this matters, it helps to understand how to get ChatGPT to generate images, since those are often what need citing. As these tools become a daily part of our work, knowing how to both prompt and cite is no longer just a good idea—it’s an essential skill.
Creating the Reference List Entry
Putting together a reference list entry for an AI-generated image can feel a bit strange at first, but it follows the same basic APA 7 principles you already know. You're just answering four simple questions: Who made it? When was it made? What is it? And where can someone find it?
Let's break down how to adapt these four core elements—Author, Date, Title, and Source—for the unique world of generative AI. I'll walk you through building the citation piece by piece.
Identifying the Author of the Image
First things first: who is the "author"? This is where most people get tripped up. It’s not you, even though you wrote the prompt. According to APA guidelines, the author is the group or company responsible for creating the work. For AI content, that means crediting the developer of the model.
Think of it like this: you were the director, but the AI tool was the camera and crew that actually produced the image. So, you give credit to the developer.
- For DALL-E 3, the author is OpenAI.
- For Midjourney, the author is Midjourney.
- For Stable Diffusion, the author is Stability AI.
Always list the developer's name as the author. It's the foundation of a correct APA 7 citation.
Setting the Date and Title
Next up are the date and the title. The date part is easy—it’s just the year the image was generated. If you created an image for a paper you're writing in 2024, the year is 2024. Simple.
The title, on the other hand, needs a little more attention. Since these images don't come with official titles, you'll create a brief, descriptive one yourself. You'll then put it in italics and enclose it in square brackets to show that it's a description you've provided, not a formal title.
For example, a solid title would look like this: [Photorealistic image of a red panda wearing a tiny astronaut helmet]. It's clear, concise, and tells the reader exactly what to expect.
A Quick Tip: When writing your description, stick to the facts. Describe the main subject and any key visual details. Try to avoid adding your own interpretation of the image—just state what's there. This helps maintain clarity and objectivity in your work.
Defining the Source and Version
Finally, let's nail down the "Source" element. This is where you identify the specific AI tool you used. But don't just stop at the name; you also need to include the version number if one is available. This is especially important for tools like Midjourney, where V5.2 and V6 can produce dramatically different styles.
Here's the basic structure you'll follow:
Developer Name. (Year). Name of AI model (Version #) [Description of work]. URL
This template gives you a reliable framework for citing pretty much any AI image generator. As these tools evolve, keeping track of versions becomes even more critical. With the AI image generator market expected to reach $917.4 million by 2030 and platforms like Midjourney and DALL-E dominating with over 50% of the market, precise citations are essential for good scholarship. You can read more about AI image generator market statistics on artsmart.ai.
Real-World Citation Examples
Let's see how this template works with some of the biggest names in AI image generation. Feel free to use these as a guide for your own reference list.
Midjourney Example
Midjourney, Inc. (2024). Midjourney (V6) [AI-generated image]. https://www.midjourney.com
DALL-E 3 Example
OpenAI. (2024). DALL-E 3 [AI-generated image]. https://openai.com/dall-e-3
Stable Diffusion Example
Stability AI. (2024). Stable Diffusion 3 [AI-generated image]. https://stability.ai/stablediffusion3
Notice the pattern? The developer is the author, the year is when the image was made, the model name is italicized, and the URL points directly to the tool. Sticking to this format ensures your reference list entry for how to cite AI-generated images APA 7 is perfectly formatted every time.
Using In-Text Citations and Formatting Figures
Once you’ve nailed down the reference list entry, it's time to actually use the AI-generated image in your paper. This is a two-part process: you'll need to cite the image within your text and then format it correctly as an APA 7 figure. Getting these details right is what separates a polished, professional paper from an amateur one.
In-Text Citations Made Simple
Citing an AI image within your text uses the standard author-date format you're probably already using for other sources. Just treat the AI's developer as the author and use the year the image was generated.
Most of the time, you'll use a parenthetical citation. This is where you drop the citation in parentheses at the end of a sentence. It's clean and doesn't interrupt the flow.
- Example: A visual representation of a neural network can help illustrate the complexity of deep learning models (OpenAI, 2024).
Sometimes, though, you might want to mention the creator directly in your sentence. That’s when a narrative citation comes in handy. You just weave the developer's name into the text and put the year right after it.
- Example: As shown in the image generated by OpenAI (2024), the nodes within the network are interconnected in a complex web.
Neither one is better than the other; it just comes down to what sounds more natural in your sentence. The most important thing is to be consistent and make sure every image you mention has a matching entry in your reference list.
Formatting Your Image as an APA 7 Figure
In academic writing, you can't just drop an image onto the page and call it a day. APA 7 has a specific structure for figures that makes your work look clean and provides all the necessary context. Every figure needs four key pieces: a number, a title, the image, and a detailed note.
Here’s a quick rundown of each part:
- Figure Number: You'll number all figures sequentially as they appear in your paper (e.g., Figure 1, Figure 2). This number goes above the title in bold.
- Title: Right below the number, add a brief, descriptive title in italics. It should tell the reader exactly what they're looking at.
- Image: Place the AI-generated image itself directly below the title.
- Note: This is where the magic happens for AI images. The note, which goes directly under the image, is where you must include the full text prompt you used, the AI tool, and all the relevant citation info.
A quick practical tip: AI-generated images can be huge, and many submission portals have strict file size limits. It's worth learning about optimizing image file sizes without losing quality to avoid headaches later on.
Pro Tip: Don't skimp on the figure note. This is your chance to be completely transparent. You should always include the entire, unabridged text prompt you used. This is crucial for reproducibility, as it lets others understand exactly how you created the visual.
A Complete Figure Example
Let's see what this looks like all put together. The official APA Style guide provides a perfect example of how a formatted figure should appear.
This screenshot nails it. You can see the bold Figure 1, the italicized title, the image, and a comprehensive note. The note clearly states the prompt ("an oil painting of a robot playing a cello in the style of Monet"), the tool (DALL-E 2), the developer (OpenAI), and the year. This is the gold standard for how to cite AI-generated images in APA 7.
Navigating Complex Citation Scenarios
Let's be real—creating images with AI is rarely a one-click process. You might generate something in Midjourney and then pop it into Photoshop for some final tweaks. Maybe you used a cool new app that runs on another company's AI model. Or perhaps you created a whole series of images to show how an idea evolved. These real-world situations need a more thoughtful approach to citation.
The good news is you don't have to throw the APA rulebook out the window. The core principles still apply. Your main job is to adapt them so the citation tells the true story of how the visual came to be, even if that story has a few extra chapters.
Citing Images Modified After Generation
What happens when you generate an image and then edit it yourself? Say you tweaked the colors, cropped the frame, or added a text overlay. This is a common workflow, and your citation needs to reflect both the AI's contribution and your own.
The reference list entry will stay the same because the original image still came from the AI. The real change happens in the figure note. This is where you need to be transparent about your edits.
- Original Note: Note. From "Detailed oil painting of a futuristic city at sunset..." by Midjourney, 2024, (https://www.midjourney.com).
- Modified Note: Note. Image generated by Midjourney and subsequently modified for color correction and cropping. From "Detailed oil painting..." by Midjourney, 2024, (https://www.midjourney.com).
That one little sentence adds crucial context. It tells your reader that the final image is a blend of machine generation and human touch.
This simple decision tree can help you decide when a full figure format is necessary versus a quick in-text mention.
As the flowchart shows, the main question is how you're using the image. If it's a formal figure in your paper, it needs the full treatment. If you're just mentioning it in passing, a simple parenthetical citation will do the trick.
The table below breaks down how to handle a few other common situations you might run into.
Citation Adjustments for Different AI Image Workflows
| Scenario | Key Adjustment to Citation | Example Note |
|---|---|---|
| Post-Generation Editing | Add a sentence in the figure note detailing the specific modifications made (e.g., color correction, cropping, text overlay). | Note. Image generated by Midjourney and subsequently modified to adjust color saturation and add a text label. From... |
| Using Third-Party Apps | Credit the foundational AI model's developer (e.g., Stability AI) as the "Author," then name the specific app in the note. | Note. Image generated using the DesignDream app, which is powered by Stable Diffusion. From "A cozy reading nook..." by Stability AI, 2024... |
| Image Composites | In the note, explain that the figure is a composite of multiple AI-generated images and provide the prompts for each component. | Note. Figure is a composite of two images generated by DALL-E 3. The background was generated with prompt A, and the foreground with prompt B... |
| Presenting an Image Series | Group images under one figure (e.g., Figure 1a, 1b). Use a single note to explain the series and provide the common prompt. | Note. The images show three variations generated from the prompt "A photorealistic image of a vintage camera on a wooden desk." by DALL-E 3, 2024... |
These adjustments ensure your citations are both accurate and transparent, no matter how complex your creative process gets.
Handling Third-Party Tools and APIs
The AI world is a web of interconnected tools. It's common to use an app that's actually running on another company's model. Think of a specialized interior design app that uses Stability AI's engine to create mockups.
When this is the case, your citation needs to credit the developer of the foundational AI model. The app you used is the platform, but the "author" is the company that built the engine.
My rule of thumb: Always trace the tech back to its source. The author in your APA citation should be the developer of the core AI model, not just the name of the app you opened.
So, if you used a tool called "DesignDream" that runs on Stable Diffusion, the author is Stability AI. You would then mention the DesignDream app in your figure note to give the full picture of your workflow.
Referencing a Sequence of Images
Sometimes, a single image just doesn't cut it. You might need a series to show a process, illustrate variations from one prompt, or track the evolution of an idea.
Instead of creating a separate figure for each image (which gets messy fast), group them under a single figure number. You can then label each individual image with a letter (a, b, c).
- Figure 1
- Variations of a "Cyberpunk Cat" Generated by DALL-E 3
Arrange the images side-by-side or in a grid. In your figure note, simply explain that the images are part of a series and provide the shared prompt and AI tool details. It’s a much cleaner way to present your work.
The Critical Role of Documenting Your Prompt
Across all these scenarios, one thing remains absolutely essential: your prompt. Think of the prompt as the reproducible part of your methodology. It’s the specific instruction that connects your idea to the AI's output. Fully understanding what is a prompt is key to seeing why it’s so important for citation.
For academic and scientific integrity, including the exact prompt in your figure note is non-negotiable. It’s the ultimate act of transparency, allowing others to understand, critique, and even try to replicate your results.
Ethical Considerations for Using AI Images
Getting the APA 7 format right is just the start. When you use AI-generated images, you're stepping into a new ethical landscape that's all about transparency, copyright, and avoiding misrepresentation.
At the end of the day, it really boils down to honesty. If an AI made the image, you need to say so. Passing off a machine-generated visual as a real photograph or a piece of human-made art is misleading, and it chips away at your audience's trust. Think of clear attribution as the bedrock of using these tools responsibly.
The Murky Waters of Copyright
The legal side of AI-generated content is still being figured out. A landmark ruling from the U.S. Copyright Office made it clear: works created entirely by AI without meaningful human input cannot be copyrighted. This means many of the images you create don't have the same legal standing as a photo you take or an illustration you draw.
So, what does this mean for you? Even if a platform’s terms grant you a license to use your creations, the underlying copyright situation is tricky. You absolutely have to read the terms of service for the specific AI tool you're using. Platforms like Midjourney and DALL-E 3 have very different rules about commercial use and ownership, and you need to know what you’re agreeing to.
Disclosing Tools and Prompts Is an Ethical Imperative
Your prompt is your methodology. Leaving it out is like a scientist publishing results without explaining the experiment. Including the full prompt in your figure note isn't just a good idea—it's an essential ethical practice. It creates a transparent, repeatable record of how the image came into existence.
This kind of transparency does two critical things:
- It ensures reproducibility. It lets other people understand your creative process and even try to build on your work by generating similar results.
- It upholds academic integrity. It draws a clear line between the instructions you gave the AI and the final output it produced.
Getting this wrong can cause real problems. We saw this with the backlash over an AI-generated concert crowd, which kicked off a huge public debate about authenticity. Being upfront about your tools and methods from the start prevents these kinds of issues.
A Key Takeaway: Your citation is more than an academic box to check; it's an ethical statement. It shows you're using AI transparently and giving your audience the context they need to judge your work fairly.
Acknowledging Potential Bias in AI Models
AI image generators are not neutral observers. They learn from massive datasets of images scraped from the internet, and those datasets are full of human biases related to gender, race, and culture. The AIs can inherit and even amplify these biases.
For example, ask an AI to generate an image of a "CEO," and you might see a pattern of results that reflects outdated stereotypes. As a user, you have to be aware of this. You might need to add specific details to your prompts to guide the AI toward more diverse and inclusive visuals. Recognizing this potential for bias—and actively working to counteract it with thoughtful prompting—is a core part of using these tools ethically. Your job isn't just to generate an image, but to steer the AI toward a more equitable and accurate depiction.
Common Questions About Citing AI Art
Even with official guidelines, citing something as new as AI-generated art can feel like navigating a gray area. A few common questions seem to pop up again and again. Let's walk through them so you can handle these specific situations with confidence and make sure your citations are spot-on.
Who Is the Author of an AI Image in APA 7?
This is, by far, the most common point of confusion. The answer is simple, but it might not be what you expect. In APA 7, the "author" is the entity that created the work. For AI images, that means the author is the company or organization behind the AI model—not you, the person who wrote the prompt.
Think of it this way: you provided the creative direction, but the tool itself did the actual creating.
- For an image from DALL-E 3, the author is OpenAI.
- For an image from Midjourney, the author is Midjourney, Inc.
- For an image from Stable Diffusion, the author is Stability AI.
Always give credit to the developer. Getting this right is the cornerstone of a correct AI citation.
Do I Need to Cite a Heavily Edited AI Image?
Yes, absolutely. Even if you've spent hours in Photoshop tweaking, color-correcting, or compositing, you still need to cite the original AI-generated image. Since the AI created the foundation of your visual, attribution is crucial for transparency.
Your reference list entry won't change; it will still credit the AI tool that produced the initial image. The key is to add a brief explanation of your edits in the figure's note.
For example, you could add this to your note: Note. Image generated using DALL-E 3 and later edited in Adobe Photoshop to adjust color balance and add text. This gives your reader a full, honest picture of your creative process.
What if the AI Tool Doesn’t Have a Version Number?
This happens all the time. Many web-based AI tools have moved away from traditional version numbers, opting for continuous updates instead. The APA Style guide has acknowledged this and updated its recommendations. If you can't find a version number, don't worry—you don't need to include one.
Instead, just be as specific as you can. Mention the model name if it's available (like "DALL-E 3" or "Midjourney V6"). If there's no specific model listed, using the tool's name (like "Midjourney") is perfectly fine.
Are Images From Any AI Generator Okay for Academic Use?
While you can technically cite an image from any generator (as long as you have the author, date, and source info), not all tools are suitable for academic or professional projects.
The biggest factor here is the platform's terms of service. Some generators have very restrictive rules about how their images can be used, especially for commercial or public purposes. Others have murky policies on data privacy and copyright that could land you in hot water.
For academic work, it's safest to stick with well-known, established tools like DALL-E, Midjourney, or Stable Diffusion. Their usage rights are generally much clearer. Always take a few minutes to review the terms before you use an image—it's a critical step for avoiding ethical or legal headaches down the line.
At Promptaa, we believe that a great prompt is the first step toward a great AI-generated image. Our platform helps you build, refine, and organize your prompts so you can get the best possible results from any AI tool. Stop guessing and start creating with precision. Explore our library and enhance your workflow today at https://promptaa.com.